「コメ買ったことはない」発言の江藤農水大臣 政府・与党内で辞任不可避の情勢
The series of issues surrounding Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Eto’s remark, “I have never bought rice,” highlights the importance of not only agricultural policies but also the qualities expected of politicians and their consideration for public sentiment.
This statement has caused a significant backlash, leading to a situation where resignation is seen as inevitable within the government and the ruling party. This reaction reflects a strong sentiment regarding the serious political responsibility associated with insensitivity to food issues that directly impact people’s lives.
First, Minister Eto’s comment was perceived as extremely insensitive, especially given the current situation where rice prices remain high, causing confusion for many consumers and farmers. Since rice is a staple food in Japan and an essential part of daily life, fluctuations in its price significantly affect the population. In this context, declaring, “I have never bought rice,” gives the impression that he is out of touch with the realities faced by the public, contributing to a loss of trust in him as a politician. As someone responsible for agricultural policy, there is an expectation to understand the consumer perspective and the realities of the agricultural sector, and this statement contradicted that expectation.
Moreover, the opposition parties, five in total, have united in calling for his dismissal, and discussions regarding a no-confidence motion are being considered, escalating political conflict. Given forecasts that the opposition may gain ground even in the House of Representatives, where the ruling party holds a majority, Minister Eto’s position has become very precarious. This situation goes beyond a mere personal gaffe and could affect the overall credibility and governing ability of the administration, necessitating a swift and appropriate response from the government.
Furthermore, Minister Eto’s remarks could exacerbate public distrust in agricultural policies. Japanese agriculture faces numerous challenges, including aging farmers, a lack of successors, and intensified international competition, making government support and policies for stable supply essential. When the head of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries makes remarks that seem dismissive of public sentiment and on-site voices, it raises questions about the reliability and transparency of agricultural policy.
This incident also serves as a lesson on the importance of a politician’s words and actions. When dealing with issues that profoundly affect daily lives, careful word choice and sincere accountability are crucial. Careless remarks like those made this time should be avoided to prevent triggering political turmoil.
In conclusion, Minister Eto’s statement, “I have never bought rice,” reveals a lack of awareness regarding food issues directly affecting people’s lives and a deficiency in the sense of responsibility expected of politicians. The current situation, in which resignation seems unavoidable, is justified, and this moment presents an opportunity for a reevaluation of agricultural policies and a strengthening of the qualities expected of politicians. Moving forward, it is necessary to sincerely listen to the voices of the public and develop concrete and realistic policy responses to regain trust.
<Reactions from the internet>
- In the end, he was utterly incompetent and did nothing.
- There’s no need for politicians who incite the public instead of reducing prices.
- It’s clear that hereditary politicians view the public and the nation with disdain, as if they believe, “We don’t care about you lower-class citizens.”
- Let’s deliver a decisive blow to the Liberal Democratic Party members in the Upper House elections. No mercy and no compassion are needed. We must act resolutely.
- He should have simply apologized; his excuses about “trying to be funny with a Miyazaki dialect” were absurd.
- A man who has turned all citizens into enemies.
- Back in 2010, he wrote on his blog, “A supporter gave me 60 kilograms of rice! I was so happy!” It’s true that there must be plenty to sell. Even if he is dismissed, it’s unacceptable.
- I call for arrests for bribery.
- Acknowledging the gift would mean bribery; thus, he compounded lies upon lies, leading to absurdity.
What do you all think?
